Last Updated: April 5, 2024. Report error / Make suggestion

The Washington State Supreme Court’s ruling in the case State v. Blake found that the law criminalizing drug possession, RCW 69.50.4013, was unconstitutional. As a result of this ruling, any prior conviction under this law, and certain other related law, can be removed from your criminal record.

As a result, your conviction can be vacated. This means the conviction will be treated as if it never occurred. All fines or fees associated with your conviction will be eliminated. If you have made payments towards these fines or fees, you should get them back. Courts are still working on processes for refunding these payments, so you likely will not receive an immediate refund.

Step-by-Step Instructions

The numbers below, such as RCW 69.50.4013, refer to the specific law that the conviction was under. The same crime may have been prosecuted under a different law depending on when it happened. Where you see specific years next to the statute, only crimes that occurred during those times are eligible. Any convictions that occurred after February 25, 2021 are not likely eligible for a Blake vacate.

Step 1Look for eligible possession convictions

If you do not remember the details of your conviction(s), or need help obtaining a free copy of your criminal history, please fill out this request form and we will send you a copy of your criminal history report.

Do you have any convictions for drug possession?

  • Controlled Substance Possession – No Prescription RCW 69.50.4013
  • Controlled Substance Violation D – RCW 69.50.401(D) Please note, only convictions under section D are eligible. These convictions would be for offenses prior to July 1, 2004.
  • This includes any convictions for attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit one of the crimes listed above.

If yes: The conviction(s) is eligible to vacate

Step 2:Look for other drug or alcohol possession convictions

Do you have any other similar drug/alcohol possession convictions?

  • Possession of Marijuana – RCW 69.50.401(e) and RCW 69.50.4014
  • Possession of Legend Drugs – RCW 69.41.030 and 69.41.070(3) [1973-June 30, 2004], and RCW 69.41.030(2)(b) [July 1, 2004 – 2021]
  • Possession of Narcotics – RCW 69.33.020
  • Possession of Counterfeit Substances – RCW 69.50.4011 [July 1, 2004 –2021]
  • Minor in Possession of Alcohol – RCW 66.44.270(2)(a)
  • This includes any convictions for attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit one of the crimes listed above.

If yes: The conviction(s) may be eligible to vacate. If you have one of these convictions, you should contact us because these cases can be complicated.

Step 3Look for convictions that were based on one of the convictions above

Do you have any convictions where one of the crimes in Steps 1 or 2 was the only basis for the charge?

  • Unlawful Possession of a Firearm – RCW 9.41.040(2)(a) [July 1, 2004 – June 30, 2022-2021] and 9.41.040(1)(b) [July 1, 1994 – June 30, 2004]
  • Bail Jumping – RCW 9A.76.170
  • Failure to Appear or Surrender – RCW 9A.76.190
  • Escape (1st, 2nd or 3rd Degree) – RCW 9.31.010, 9A.76.110, 9A.76.120, and 9A.76.130
  • Resisting Arrest – RCW 9.69.040 and 9A.76.040

If yes: The conviction(s) may be eligible to vacate. If you have one of these convictions, you should schedule a free consultation with our attorneys because these cases can be complicated.

What to do now

Now that you have reviewed your eligibility for Blake relief, please visit WA Law Help for more information on how to get documents and how to file a motion to vacate your conviction(s).

You may also be able to get an attorney appointed to assist you in some Washington counties.

Please watch this recording of Your rights after State V. Blake, done in partnership with Washington LawHelp and The Way to Justice

Puede mirar la versión en español aquí.

Impact on Social Security Benefits

If you receive a refund of LFOs under Blake, it may impact your eligibility for certain government benefits. Review Blake and Social Security Benefits FAQs.


The information on this website is not legal advice. You should not and are not authorized to rely on this website as a source of legal advice. While Civil Survival goes to great lengths to make sure the information on the website is accurate, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of this information and are not responsible for any consequences that may result from the use of this website. We recommend that you consult with an attorney for assurance that the information on the website and your interpretation of it are appropriate for your situation.

More Legal Support Guides

Reducing Legal Financial Obligations

If you were convicted of a crime in Washington, you may be eligible for relief from some or all of the legal financial obligations (LFOs) attached to your case(s). The amount of relief you may be eligible for depends on the type of conviction, the types of LFOs assessed, and your financial resources.

Guide to Determining Blake Eligibility

The Washington State Supreme Court’s ruling in the case State v. Blake found that the law criminalizing drug possession, RCW 69.50.4013, was unconstitutional. As a result of this ruling, any prior conviction under this law, and certain other related law, can be removed from your criminal record.

Vacating a Misdemeanor Conviction

Washington law allows for certain misdemeanor convictions to be vacated if specific criteria are met. This means that the conviction will be treated as if it never occurred.

Vacating a Felony Conviction

Washington law allows for certain felony convictions to be vacated if specific criteria are met. This means that the conviction will be treated as if it never occurred.

Legal Financial Obligations (LFOs) FAQ

Legal financial obligations (LFOs) are debts related to a criminal conviction, including fines, costs and fees and restitution imposed by the court as part of a criminal sentence.

Warrants FAQ

Learn what warrants are, how they impact you, and one happens if you have one.